terror in delhi 10/29
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
  Shocking hypocrisy from Christopher Kremmer Christopher Kremmer who works for Sydney Morning Herald wrote in the aftermath of London terror attacks:
But to link a reasoned critique of Western foreign policy blunders to a justification for the killing and maiming of innocent commuters in the London peak hour endows murder with an aura of morality and reason it does not deserve. The London bombings are the price Britain pays for being a democratic, multicultural society, not the war in Iraq. What is required in the new era of terrorism is the capacity to discriminate in our judgements, not to abandon the ability to judge everyone except the United States and its allies, as Ali would have us do. George Bush's policies may be deeply worrying, but that doesn't make bin Laden a hero. But Western democracy and theocratic terror are not moral equivalents.

If the bombers have achieved anything, it is to remind us democracies occasionally get it wrong, but that despotic, malignant cults such as al-Qaeda that kill people merely because of the colour of their skins, or the clothes they wear, or the god they worship, are always wrong.

So in the above article he says that the British participation in Iraq is no excuse for terrorists to attack Londoners. Quite right. But the same chap now writes about the New Delhi terror attacks:

Barely a day after New Delhi's triple terrorist bomb blasts killed 61 people, the same marketplaces that were strewn with bodies were again bustling with life.

Such is India's capacity to cope with the reality of horror that some ask whether it's a model for life in the age of terrorism, or just a callous, careless country inured to its own citizens' pain.

So if New Yorkers or Londoners hit the streets after a terror attack it is called resilience, but if Delhites do it it is called callous. Read on.

But drawing the line between a terrorist on the one hand, and on the other an Assamese separatist in the country's remote north-east, or armed Maoists running their own administrations in neglected tribal districts, is more than a mere exercise in semantics. In India, violence is a political weapon that all sides - including the state itself - use.
Hey, did't we see riots in Bradford, West Midlands in the UK. Did the British government was playing fiddle with the rioters. See how in the first article he defends Britain for paying the price of being a multicultural and democratic. We understand it perfectly. But this idiot ignores the fact that India is much more larger with so many ethnicities and languages - but he gives no such leeway for a democratic India. More from this hypocrite.

Explanations for India's insensitivity to its own travails range from its huge size, to poverty and the caste system. The Nobel laureate and author V.S. Naipaul surmised that caste created a partition in the Indian mind between the individual and society as a whole.

With 240 million people living below the poverty line, and 15 million of them crowding into cities like Delhi, the struggle for survival takes precedence over fears of death.

First he makes a phoney 'Indians are insensitive' arguement and now he comes up with an equally phoney arguement. Ladies and Gentleme, presenting the caste system and poverty. This is the favorite punching bag of Western journalists when it comes to India. You see, when we talked about London attacks, did we mention British Empire's atrocities in the sub-continent as being responsible for the attacks. It could be possible that terrorists among whom were Muslim youth Pakistani origin held a grudge against Britiain for overthrowing the Ottomon Empire and hence the Caliph. Sounds phoney right. So why the fuck are you introducing all this historical baggage when it comes terror attacks against India. Call it what it is you hypocrite!

They claim themselves as 'experts' and what they do is link all the prejudices they have, with whatever good/bad happens in India. In fact, the two minds VS was referring to, better explain these pinheads.
Excellent post!
Creepy logic as you rightly say 'this idiot' displays.
Perhaps you lads are right, but Im pretty sure your general Indians,

Christopher Kremmer is one experienced writer, if youve read any of his work you'd probably hold back from criticing.

Sure If youve travelled extensively in Pakistan, Afghanastan, kyrgystan, Iran and Iraq, somebody might respect your comment,

but no doubt your just products of the mainstream Indian school system, right now not fulfilling their duties to patients in Hospitals because of pettyful government policies that get up their elitist noses.

Kremmer should be proud that he is not at all a hypocrit by what he has written, and although not famous, a true hero of world journalism.

Guys like him were probably the ones who saved your arses from being lobbed into the coolie bin of colonial india.

Save Idiot for yourself matie, nah Im being a hypocrit, respect to all, whether they be Taliban, western governments or rickshaw pullers,
stop judgin, start learning past uni degrees,

and maybe youll see.....
Kremmer also said the Gujrat riots started after a fire on a train

Dont let the facts stand in the way of the good story ...right ?

I live in Australia and it seems most of the people graduating from uni are Indians and Chinese not at all like the illerate person who wrote in support of Kremmer
Wake up to yourself Mr Critic. Kremmer is not a hypocrite. Anyone who has put in the time to travel and be there and research the facts and then speaks what they know is not a hypocrite. He is entitled to express his opinion. Thankfully it is an informed opinion and not based on what one has read in the tabloids. Anyone can be a tabloid expert. Is that not a true hypocrite? Forget the newspaper, pick up a train ticket, airfare, whatever, go to Iraq, Iran, Aghanistan, Pakistan. Wherever. Talk to policital leaders. Seek out those in hiding and get their story. Flee from bullets. Get the actual facts, then you will be informed enough to express an opinion that matters. In the meantime get a dictionary and do two things. First, learn the meaning of hypocrite. Second, learn to spell.
Hi, well be sensible, well-all described
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home
news and views about the terror attacks in new delhi on october the 29th 2005. alerting citizens of all civilized nations on new terror threats.

About Me

Name:cynical nerd
Contact: cynical.nerd@gmail.com
Blogger Profile

Never forget

The victims of terror

We Salute

The spirit of 9/11 & 7/7 & 3/11

Counter Terror

Inside Laskhar
Breeding Ground of Terror
Root Cause My A**
G.O.A.T. Comes Home To Roost
Taking The Fight To The Enemy
Terror Strikes Varanasi: Plus ca change ...

Media/Public Opinion

Shocking Hypocrisy
Candle Kisser™®© Alert
Stop This Cricketing Madness
Why Are We Gloating?

India-US nuclear agreement

N-deal: More Clarity Needed
N-deal: An Isolated PMO
N-deal: Deconstructing The ‘Cheerleaders’
N-deal: Deconstructing the Non-Proliferation Lobby
N-deal: Looking Ahead Boldly
N-agreement: Putting the cards on the table


Uncle’s Long Arm
Iran's Misplaced Anger
India's Energy Security
Balochistan Blues: Another Bangladesh In the Making?


Fun Quiz
Master G.O.A.T.
CNN: Europe's Communal Tensions
Pervix Meretricix™®© Goes to Helvetix


Bharat Rakshak
Indian Maverick
Observer Research Foundation
Secular Right
South Asia Analysis Group
South Asia Terrorism Portal
The Acorn

Blogs that link here


October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 /

Stop Terror against the Indian people