terror in delhi 10/29
Thursday, February 23, 2006
  Fast Breeder: Civil or Military or Both
Via Stratfor (subscription required):

The Indian government said Feb. 22 that it refuses to categorize its fast breeder reactors (FBRs) as civilian power plants, but that it will move ahead and separate its civilian nuclear facilities from its military ones -- one of the key U.S. demands for the deal to go through. India's insistence that its FBRs not be considered purely civilian, however, will seriously complicate the negotiations.

For all Washington cares, the FBRs can produce as much plutonium for weapons, or as much power for Bollywood's cinema screens, as India wants -- but not both. Under the Indian-U.S. nuclear deal, only civilian institutions will receive nuclear assistance. If there is a gray area, then the United States would be giving technological aid directly to India's warhead production. This would be bad, from the U.S. perspective, to say the least.
Barring a verifiable Indian promise that its FBR reactors will be cut off from the civilian power grid, it would seem unlikely that Washington would accept the terms as they stand and agree to the nuclear deal with India.

Well, we've gotta a double standards issue here. The Tritium needed for U.S. weapons program comes from what used to be the civilian facility of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant in the Tennessee Valley Authority. The plan to classify this reactor as 'strategic' under the guise of 'national security' was approved in 1999 by the Clinton administration and the plant has been producing Tritium gas since 2003. If the United States has joint civil+military reactors, then under the reciprocity clause of the July 18th deal, the FBR too should be able to connected to the power grid while generating adequate Pu for maintaining a credible deterrant. Indian negotiators should make this clear.

India has already offered much more reactors to be classified as 'civil' than any of the existing weapons states. This double standards have to end there. Just say 'no' to declaring the FBR, even if it costs the deal.

this is something new.
Why cant a defense reactor be plugged into the power grid.
the goal is to generate pu for weapons or research but what should stop them from generating electricity.
As far as i knew there was to be a separation of nuclear and civil but not which reactor can generate electricity?
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home
news and views about the terror attacks in new delhi on october the 29th 2005. alerting citizens of all civilized nations on new terror threats.

About Me

Name:cynical nerd
Contact: cynical.nerd@gmail.com
Blogger Profile

Never forget

The victims of terror

We Salute

The spirit of 9/11 & 7/7 & 3/11

Counter Terror

Inside Laskhar
Breeding Ground of Terror
Root Cause My A**
G.O.A.T. Comes Home To Roost
Taking The Fight To The Enemy
Terror Strikes Varanasi: Plus ca change ...

Media/Public Opinion

Shocking Hypocrisy
Candle Kisser™®© Alert
Stop This Cricketing Madness
Why Are We Gloating?

India-US nuclear agreement

N-deal: More Clarity Needed
N-deal: An Isolated PMO
N-deal: Deconstructing The ‘Cheerleaders’
N-deal: Deconstructing the Non-Proliferation Lobby
N-deal: Looking Ahead Boldly
N-agreement: Putting the cards on the table


Uncle’s Long Arm
Iran's Misplaced Anger
India's Energy Security
Balochistan Blues: Another Bangladesh In the Making?


Fun Quiz
Master G.O.A.T.
CNN: Europe's Communal Tensions
Pervix Meretricix™®© Goes to Helvetix


Bharat Rakshak
Indian Maverick
Observer Research Foundation
Secular Right
South Asia Analysis Group
South Asia Terrorism Portal
The Acorn

Blogs that link here


October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 /

Stop Terror against the Indian people